مقاييس نموذجية لتقييم درجة خطورة نزلاء المؤسسات العقابية والإصلاحية

أولاً: المراجع العربية

• بيراز، جمال؛ وسعدي، حيدرة (2021). الخطورة الإجرامية كمعيار للحكم بعقوبة العمل للنفع العام. مجلة الرسالة للدراسات والبحوث الإنسانية، 6(2)، 228-237.

• سرور، أحمد فتحي (2013). الوسيط في قانون العقوبات، القسم العام، الطبعة الخامسة. القاهرة: دار النهضة العربية.

• كميل، محمد (2020). الخطورة الإجرامية وأثرها في تقدير العقوبة البديلة في التشريع الجنائي الفلسطيني. مجلة الحقوق والعلوم السياسية (1)، 47-64.

• لحرش، أيوب التومي؛ والنحوي، سليمان (2020). دور العدالة الجنائية في الحد من الخطورة الإجرامية أثناء تنفيذ العقوبة. المجلة الأكاديمية للبحوث القانونية والسياسية، 4(2)، 799-808.

• لريد، محمد أحمد (2016). الخطورة الإجرامية ودورها في السياسة الجنائية المعاصرة. الدراسات القانونية المقارنة. 2(1)، 1-21.

• منصور، إسحاق إبراهيم (2006). الموجز في علم الإجرام وعلم العقاب. الجزائر: ديوان المطبوعات الجامعية.

ثانياً: المراجع الأجنبية

• American Psychiatric Association. (1974). Clinical aspects of violent individuals. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.‏

• Andrews, D. A. (2012). The risk-need-responsivity (RNR) model of correctional assessment and treatment. In J. A. Dvoskin, J. L. Skeem, R. W. Novaco, & K. S. Douglas (Eds.), Using social science to reduce violent offending (pp. 127–156). New York, NY: Oxford

• Andrews, D. A., & Bonta, J. (2006). The psychology of criminal conduct (4th ed.). Cincinnati, OH: Anderson

• Andrews, D. A., Bonta, J., & Hoge, R. D. (1990). Classification for effective rehabilitation: Rediscovering psychology. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 17, 19-52.

• Arai, K., Takano, A., Nagata, T., & Hirabayashi, N. (2017). Predictive accuracy of the Historical-Clinical-Risk Management-20 for violence in forensic psychiatric wards in Japan.Criminal behavior and mental health,27(5), 409-420.‏

• Belfrage, H. (1998). Implementing the HCR-20 scheme for risk assessment in a forensic psychiatric hospital: Integrating research and clinical practice.The journal of forensic Psychiatry,9(2), 328-338.‏

• Bonta, J. (1996). Risk-needs assessment and treatment. In A. T. Harland (Ed.),Choosing correctional options that work: Defining the demand and evaluating the supply(pp. 18–32). Sage Publications, Inc.

• Bonta, J., & Wormith, S. J. (2007). Risk and need assessment.Developments in social work with offenders, 131-152.‏

• Bonta, J., Harman, W. G., Han, R. G., & Cormier, R. B. (1996). The prediction of recidivism among federally sentenced offenders: A re-validation of the SIR scale. Canadian Journal of Criminology, 38(1), 61–79.

• Brinkley, C., A. (2015) Use of Assessment Measures for the Evaluation of Future Risk. In Pietz, C. A. andMattson, C. A. (Eds). Violent Offenders Understanding and Assessment. Oxford University Press.

• Burgess, E.W. (1928). Factors determining success or failure on parole. In A. A. Bruce, A. J. Harno, E. W. Burgess, & J. Landesco (Eds.), The workings of the indeterminate‑sentence law and the parole system in Illinois (pp. 221-234). Springfield, IL: State Board of Parole.

• Campbell, M. A., French, S., & Gendreau, P. (2007).Assessing the utility of risk assessment tools and personality measures in the prediction of violent recidivism for adult offenders. Ottawa, ON: Public Safety Canada.‏

• Campbell, M., French, S., & Gendreau, P. (2009). The prediction of violence in adult offenders: A meta- analytic comparison of instruments and methods of assessment. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 36(6), 567– 590.

• Churcher FP, Mills JF, Forth AE. The predictive validity of the Two-Tiered Violence Risk Estimates Scale (TTV) in a long-term follow-up of violent offenders. Psychol Serv. 2016 Aug;13(3):232-245.

• Churcher, Frances P. (2015). The Predictive Validity of the Two-Tiered Violence Risk Estimates Scale (TTV) in a Long-Term Follow-Up of High-Risk Federal Offenders. https://curve.carleton.ca/system/files/etd/fa58aee7-63e0-4982-960b-1cf4222ef3ef/etd_pdf/51ea8e26ef2fda0c174c4509a42efa93/churcher-thepredictivevalidityofthetwotieredviolence.pdf

• Coid, J., Yang, M., Ullrich, S., Zhang, T., Sizmur, S., Roberts, C., ... & Rogers, R. D. (2009). Gender differences in structured risk assessment: comparing the accuracy of five instruments.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology,77(2), 337.‏

• Conroy, M. A. (2012). Assessing Juveniles for Risk of Violence. In Grigorenko, E. L. (ed.), Handbook of Juvenile Forensic Psychology and Psychiatry, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4614-0905-2_15, © Springer Science Business Media, LLC

• Conroy, M.A., & Morrie, D.C. (2007). Forensic assessment of violence risk: A Guide for Risk Assessment and Risk Management Hoboken, NJ:Wiley.

• De Page, L.; Englebert, j. and Titeca, P. (2020). L’Žvaluation du risque de violence. Comment Žvaluer le risque sans concession sur la primautŽ de la clinique ? Annales MŽdico-psychologiques, revue psychiatrique, 178, (4),335-339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amp.2019.04.013.

• De Vogel, V., & de Ruiter, C. (2005). The HCR-20 in personality disordered female offenders: A comparison with a matched sample of males.Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy: An International Journal of Theory & Practice,12(3), 226-240.‏

• De Vogel, V., Bruggeman, M., & Lancel, M. (2019). Gender-sensitive violence risk assessment: Predictive validity of six tools in female forensic psychiatric patients.Criminal justice and behavior,46(4), 528-549.‏

• De Vogel, V., De Beuf, T., Shepherd, S., & Schneider, R. D. (2022). Violence risk assessment with the HCR-20V3 in legal contexts: A critical reflection. Journal of personality assessment, 104(2), 252-264.‏

• DeMatteo, David & Olver, Mark E. (2022) Use of the Psychopathy Checklist-Revised in Legal Contexts: Validity, Reliability, Admissibility, and Evidentiary Issues, Journal of Personality Assessment, 104:2, 234-251, DOI: 10.1080/00223891.2021.1955693

• Desmarais, S. L., & Singh, J. P. (2013). Risk assessment instruments validated and implemented in correctional settings in the United States.Lexington, KY: Council of State Governments.‏

• Desmarais, S. L., & Zottola, S. A. (2019). Violence risk assessment: Current status and contemporary issues. Marq. L. Rev., 103, 793.‏

• Diane S. Strub, Kevin S. Douglas & Tonia L. Nicholls (2016) Violence Risk Assessment of Civil Psychiatric Patients with the HCR-20: Does Gender Matter? International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 15:1, 81-96, DOI: 10.1080/14999013.2016.1141438

• Douglas, Hart, Groscup and Litwack (2013) Assessing Violence Risk. In Weiner, I. B., & Otto, R. K. (Eds.). The handbook of forensic psychology. John Wiley & Sons.‏

• Douglas, K. S. & Otto, R. K. (Eds.). (2021). Handbook of violence risk assessment (2nd ed.). Routledge

• Douglas, K. S. (2014). Version 3 of the Historical-Clinical-Risk Management-20 (HCR-20V3): Relevance to violence risk assessment and management in forensic conditional release contexts. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 32(5), 557-576.‏

• Douglas, K. S., & Kropp, P. R. (2002). A prevention-based paradigm for violence risk assessment: Clinical and research applications.Criminal Justice and Behavior,29(5), 617-658.‏

• Douglas, K. S., & Reeves, K. (2009). HCR- 20 violence assessment scheme: Rationale, application and empirical overview. In R. Otto & K. S. Douglas (Eds.), Handbook of violence risk assessment (pp. 147– 185). New York: Routledge

• Douglas, K. S., Blanchard, A. J., Guy, L. S., Reeves, K. A., & Weir, J. (2010). HCR: 20 violence risk assessment schemes: Review and annotated bibliography (Current up to September 1, 2010).‏

• Douglas, K. S., Cox, D. N., & Webster, C. D. (1999). Violence risk assessment: Science and practice. Legal and criminological psychology, 4(2), 149-184.‏

• Douglas, K. S., Shaffer, C., Blanchard, A. J. E., Guy, L. S., Reeves, K., & Weir, J. (2014). HCR- 20 violence risk assessment scheme: Overview and annotated bibliography. HCR- 20 violence risk assessment white paper series, no. 1. Burnaby, Canada: Mental Health, Law, and Policy Institute, Simon Fraser University.

• Douglas, K.S Hart, S. D.; Groscup, J.L. and Litwack, T. R. (2013). Assessing Violence Risk. In I. B. Weiner and R. K. Otto (Eds). The Handbook of Forensic Psychology. John Wiley & Sons, Inc

• Drake, E. (2014). Predicting criminal recidivism: A systematic review of offender risk

• Fazel, S., Singh, J. P., Doll, H., & Grann, M. (2012). Use of risk assessment instruments to predict violence and antisocial behavior in 73 samples involving 24 827 people: systematic review and meta-analysis. Bmj, 345.‏

• Fyfe & Gailey. (2011). e Scottish Approach to High-Risk Oenders: Early Answers or Further Questions. InDangerous People(pp. 213-228). Routledge.‏

• Glover et al. (2017). A cross-validation of the Violence Risk Appraisal Guide–Revised (VRAG-R) within a correctional sample. Law and Human Behavior.http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000257

• Gray N., McGleish A., MacCulloch M., et al. (2003) Prediction of violence and self-harm in mentally disordered offenders: A Prospective study of the efficacy of HCR-20, PCL–R, and psychiatric symptomatology. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 71, 443–450. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.71.3.443.

• Guy, L. S. (2008). Performance indicators of the structured professional judgment approach for assessing risk for violence to others: A meta- analytic survey. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, Canada.

• Hamilton Z, Kigerl A, Campagna M. (2016) Designed to Fit: The Development and Validation of the STRONG-R Recidivism Risk Assessment. Criminal Justice and Behavior. 2016;43(2):230-263.

• Hamilton, Z., Tollefsbol, E., Campagna, M., & van Wormer, J. (2017). Customizing Criminal Justice Assessments. In F.S. Taxman (Ed.), Handbook on Risk and Need Assessment: Theory and Practice, Volume 1 (333-377). New York, NY: Routledge.

• Hanson, R. K., & Thornton, D. (1999).Static 99: Improving actuarial risk assessments for sex offenders(Vol. 2). Ottawa, Ontario: Solicitor General Canada.‏

• Hanson, R. K., & Thornton, D. (2000). STATIC-99: Improving risk assessments for sex offenders: A comparison of three actuarial scales. Law and Human Behavior, 24, 119-136.

• Hanson, R. K., & Thornton, D. (2003). Notes on the development of STATIC-2002. User Report 2003—01. Ottawa, ON, Canada: Department of the Solicitor General of Canada.

• Harcourt, B., E. (2007). Against Prediction: Sentencing, Policing, and Punishing in an Actuarial Age. University of Chicago Law School Chicago Unbound. Working Paper

• Hare, R. D. (2003). The Hare Psychopathy Checklist—Revised (2nd ed.). Toronto, ON, Canada: Multi-Health Systems.

• Hare, R. D. (2007). Psychological instruments in the assessment of psychopathy. In A. R. Felthous & H. Sass (Eds.), International handbook on psychopathic disorders and the law (pp. 41-67). New York: Wiley & Sons.

• Harris, G. T., Rice, M. E., Quinsey, V. L., Lalumiere, M. L., Boer, D., & Lang, C. (2003). A multi-site comparison of actuarial risk instruments for sex offenders. Psychological Assessment, 15, 413—125.

• Harris, G.T., Rice, M.E., & Quinsey, V.L. (2016). Violence Risk Appraisal Guide-Revised, 2013: User Guide. Data Services, Queen’s University Library.

• Hart, S. D., Douglas, K. S., & Guy, L. S. (2016). The structured professional judgement approach to violence risk assessment: Origins, nature, and advances.The Wiley handbook on the theories, assessment and treatment of sexual offending,2, 643-666.‏

• Heilbrun, K. (2009).Evaluation for risk of violence in adults. OUP USA.‏

• Helmus, L. M., & Quinsey, V. L. (2020). Predicting violent reoffending with the VRAG-R: Overview, controversies, and future directions for actuarial risk scales. In J. S. Wormith, L. A. Craig and T. Hogue (Eds.) The Wiley Handbook of what works in violence risk management: Theory, research, and practice. (119-143). Chichester, United Kingdom: Wiley-Blackwell.

• Herrschaft, Bryn A. (2015). Evaluating the Reliability and Validity of the Correctional Offender Management Profiling for Alternative Sanctions (COMPAS) Tool: Implications for Community Corrections Policy. Presented at the Center for Court Innovation, January, New York, NY.

• Hertz, P.G., Eher, R., Etzler, S., & Rettenberger (2019). A cross-validation of the Violence Risk Appraisal Guide (VRAG-R) in a sample of individuals convicted of sexual offenses. Sexual Abuse.https://doi.org/10.1177//1079063219841901

• Hertz, P.G., Eher, R., Etzler, S., & Rettenberger, M. (2021). Cross-validation of the revised version of the Violence Risk Appraisal Guide (VRAG-R) in a sample of individuals convicted of sexual offenses.Sexual Abuse, 33, 63-87.

• Herve, H., & Yuille, J. (Eds.). (2007). The psychopath: Theory, research, and practice. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

• Hilton, N. Z. (2021). Domestic Violence Risk Assessment: Tools for Effective Prediction and Management, Second Edition. American Psychological Association.https://www.apa.org/pubs/books/domestic-violence-risk-assessment-second-editionSelected Publications

• Hilton, N. Z., Radatz, D. L. (2021). Criminogenic needs among intimate partner violence offenders: Association with recidivism and implications for treatment.Psychological Services.https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/ser0000450

• Howard, P. (2009) Improving prediction of reoffending using the Offender Assessment System (OASys). Ministry of Justice.

• Judges, R., Egan, V., & Broad, G. (2016) A Critique of the Historical Clinical Risk–20, Version 3, Risk Assessment Instrument, Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice, 16:4, 304-320, DOI: 10.1080/15228932.2016.1196102

• Kleinmuntz, B., Faust, D., Meehl, P.E., & Dawes, R. M. (1990). Clinical versus actuarial judgment. Science, New Series, 247 (4939), 146-147.

• Koh, L. L., Day, A., Klettke, B., Daffern, M., & Chu, C. M. (2020). The predictive validity of youth violence risk assessment tools: A systematic review.Psychology, Crime & Law,26(8), 776-796.‏

• Kroner, D., Mills, J., & Morgan, B. (2005). A coffee can, factor analysis, and prediction of antisocial behavior: The structure of criminal risk. International Journal of Law & Psychiatry, 28, 360-374

• Krug, E. G., Mercy, J. A., Dahlberg, L. L., & Zwi, A. B. (2002). The world report on violence and health.The lancet,360(9339), 1083-1088.‏

• Lansing, Sharon. 2012, September. New York State COMPAS-Probation Risk and Need Assessment Study: Examining the Recidivism Scale’s Effectiveness and Predictive Accuracy. Criminal Justice Research Report submitted to the New York State Division of Criminal Justice Services.

• Leistico, A. R., Salekin, R. T., DeCoster, J., & Rogers, R. (in press). A large-scale eta-analysis relating the Hare measures of psychopathy to antisocial conduct. Law and Human Behavio

• Lemke,R;Makarios, M; Smith, Paula; Lowenkamp, C.(2010)The Creation and Validation of the Ohio Risk Assessment System (ORAS), Federal Probation. Volume 74 Number 1:1-15.

• Litwack, T.R. (2001). Actuarial versus clinical assessments of dangerousness. Psychology Public Policy and Law, 7 (2), 409-443.

• Mann, L. and Bugaiets, T. (2020). Risk assessment standards and methodologies for diverse stakeholders in Ukraine. Council of Europe.

• Meehl, P. E. (1954). Clinical versus statistical prediction: A theoretical analysis and a review of the evidence Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. [Reprinted with new Preface. Inin Proceedings of the 1955 Invitational Conference on Testing Problems.‏

• MŽlanie Voyer, M.; and Senon, J-L. (2012). PrŽsentation comparative des outils d’Žvaluation du risque de violence. L’Information psychiatrique; 88: 445–53. https://www.cairn.info/revue-l-information-psychiatrique-2012-6-page-445.htm

• Millaud, F., & Dubreucq, J. L. (2012). Les outils d›Žvaluation du risque de violence: avantages et limites.L›information psychiatrique,88(6), 431-437.‏

• Miller, S.L., & Brodsky, S.L. (2011). Risky business:Addressing the consequences of predicting violence. Journal of American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 39, 396–401.

• Mills, J. F., & Gray, A. L. (2013). Two-tiered violence risk estimates: A validation study of an integrated-actuarial risk assessment instrument.Psychological services,10(4), 361.‏

• Monahan, J. (1981).Predicting violent behavior: An assessment of clinical techniques(pp. 95-128). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.‏

• Monahan, J. (2003). Violence risk assessment. In A. M. Goldstein & I. B. Weiner (Eds.), Handbook of psychology, Vol. 11. Forensic psychology (pp. 527–540). Hoboken, NJ:Wiley.

• Monahan, J. (2008). Structured risk assessment of violence. In R. Simon and K. Tardiff (Eds.), Textbook of violence assessment and management (pp. 17–33). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Publishing.

• Nafekh, Mark and Motiuk, Laurence. (2002). The statistical information on recidivism - revised 1 (SIR-R1) Scale: a psychometric examination. Research reportR-126, Canada: Research Branch, Correctional Service of Canada.

• National Research Council. (1989). Improving risk communication. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

• Neumann, C. S., Hare, R. D., & Newman, J. (2007). The superordinate nature of the Psychopathy Checklist-Revised. Journal of Personality Disorders, 21, 102-117.

• Nicholls, T. L., Ogloff, J. R. P., & Douglas, K. S. (2004). Assessing risk for violence among male and female civil psychiatric patients: The HCR-20, PCL:SV, and VSC. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 22, 127–158. doi: 10.1002/bsl.579.

• NOMS (2008b) National rules for tiering cases and associated guidance. Office ProbationCircular08/2008.London:NationalProbationService.Availableat http://www.probation.justice.gov.uk/files/pdf/PC08%202008.pdf

• PromŽ, G. (2020). LesRisques: dŽfinition, types, Žvaluation et gestion. Le Blog des Dispositifs MŽdicaux. https://www.qualitiso.com/risques-definition-types-evaluation-gestion/

• Pycroft, A., & Clift, S. (2012). Risk and Rehabilitation: Management and Treatment of Substance Misuse and Mental Health Problems in the Criminal Justice System. Policy Press.

• Quinsey, V. L., Harris, G. T., Rice, M. E., & Cormier, C. (2006). Violent offenders: Appraising and managing risk (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

• Quinsey, V. L., Harris, G. T., Rice, M. E., & Cormier, C. A. (2006). Violent offenders: Appraising and managing risk (2nd ed). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

• Quinsey, V. L.; Harris, G.; Rice, M. & Cormier, C. (1998). Violent offenders: Appraising and managing risk., (pp. 141-169). Washington, DC, US: American Psychological Association, xviii, 356 pp.

• Radatz, D. L., & Hilton, N. Z. (2021). The Ontario Domestic Assault Risk Assessment: Predicting violence among men with a police record of intimate partner violence in the United States.Criminal Justice and Behavior. Advance online publication, 30 July 2021.https://doi.org/10.1177/00938548211035816

• Reich, Warren A; Picard-Fritsche, Sarah; Rioja, Virginia Barber and, Rotter, Merrill (2016). Evidence-based risk assessment in a mental health Court

• Rettenberger, M., Rice, M. E., Harris, G. T., & Eher, R. (2017). Actuarial risk assessment of sexual offenders: The psychometric properties of the Sex Offender Risk Appraisal Guide (SORAG). Psychological Assessment, 29(6), 624–638.

• Rice, M. E., & Harris, G. T. (1997). Cross validation and extension of the Violence Risk Appraisal Guide for child molesters and rapists. Law and Human Behavior, 21, 231-241.

• Rice, M. E., Harris, G. T., Lang, C., & Cormier, C. (2006). Violent sex offenses: How are they best measured from official records? Law and Human Behavior, 30, 525-541.

• Shepherd, S. M., Campbell, R. E., & Ogloff, J. R. (2018). The utility of the HCR–20 in an Australian sample of forensic psychiatric patients.Psychiatry, Psychology and Law,25(2), 273-282.‏

• Singh, J. P., Bj€orkly, S., & Fazel, S. (Eds.). (2016). International perspectives on risk assessment. Oxford University Press.

• Singh, J. P., Desmarais, S. L., Hurducas, C., Arbach-Lucioni, K., Condemarin, C., Dean, K., ... & Otto, R. K. (2014). International perspectives on the practical application of violence risk assessment: A global survey of 44 countries.International Journal of Forensic Mental Health,13(3), 193-206.‏

• Singh, J. P., Grann, M., & Fazel, S. (2011). A comparative study of violence risk assessment tools: A systematic review and metaregression analysis of 68 studies involving 25,980 participants. Clinical psychology review, 31(3), 499-513.‏

• Skeem, J. L., & Monahan, J. (2011). Current directions in violence risk assessment.Current directions in psychological science,20(1), 38-42.‏

• Sreenivasan, S., Kirkish, P., Garrick, T., Weinberger, L. E., & Phenix, A. (2000). Actuarial risk assessment models: A review of critical issues related to violence and sex-offender recidivism assessments.Journal-American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law,28, 438-448.‏

• Steadman, H. J., & Cocozza, J. J. (1974). Careers of the criminally insane: Excessive social control of deviance.‏

• Storey, J. S., Campbell, V. J., & Hart, S. D. (2013). Expert evidence about violence risk assessment: A study of Canadian legal decisions. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 12, 287-296

• Strub, D. S., Douglas, K. S., & Nicholls, T. L. (2016). Violence risk assessment of civil psychiatric patients with the HCR-20: Does gender matter?International Journal of Forensic Mental Health,15(1), 81-96.‏

• Thornberry, T., & Jacoby, J. E. (1979).The criminally insane: A community follow-up of mentally ill offenders. University of Chicago Press.‏

• Vincent, G. M., Terry, A. M., & Maney, S. M. (2009). Risk/needs tools for antisocial behavior and violence among youthful populations.‏ In Andrade, J.T. (Ed.). Handbook of Violence Risk Assessment and Treatment. Springer Publishing Company, LLC.

• Webster, C. D., Douglas, K. S., Eaves, D., & Hart, S. D. (1997). Assessing risk of violence to others. In C. D. Webster & M. A. Jackson (Eds.),Impulsivity: Theory, assessment, and treatment(pp. 251–277). The Guilford Press.

• Whiting, E. (2007) Comparison of re-offending measures: OGRS2, OGRS3 and the SPP. Unpublishedinternal report. London: Home

• Wong, S. C., Olver, M. E., & Stockdale, K. C. (2009). The utility of dynamic and static factors in risk assessment, prediction, and treatment.Handbook of violence risk assessment and treatment: New approaches for mental health professionals, 83-120.‏