نمذجة المعادلة البنائية للعلوم النفسية والاجتماعية: الأسس والتطبيقات والقضايا (الجزء الأول)

أولًا: المراجع العربية:

- عامر، عبد الناصر السيد. (2004م). أداء مؤشرات حسن المطابقة لتقويم نموذج المعادلة البنائية، المجلة المصرية للدراسات النفسية، مجلد 14.

- عامر، عبد الناصر السيد. (2005م). إستراتيجية تحزيم العناصر (Item parceling) في التحليل العاملي التوكيدي، المجلة المصرية للدراسات النفسية، المجلد 18.

- عامر، عبد الناصر السيد. (2008م). الاتجاه نحو الكمبيوتر وقلق الكمبيوتر: البنية والسببية. مجلة كلية التربية ببنها، 19، 165-191.

ثانيًا: المراجع الأجنبية:

- Akaike, H. (1987). Factor analysis and AIC. Psychometrika, 52, 317-332.

- Arbuckle, J. L. (1995-2009). AMOS 18.0 Uesrs Guide.Grawfordville,FL: Amos Development Corporation.

- Anderson , J. C., & Gerbing, D. V. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: Areview and recommended two – step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 411-23.

- Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1992). Assumptions and comparative strength of the two – step approach: Comment on Fornell and YI. Sociological Methods & Research, 20, 321 – 333.

- Bagozzi, R. P. (1977). Structural equation models in experimental research. Journal of Marketing Research, 14, 209-226.

- Bagozzi, R. P., & Heatherton, T. F. (1994). AGeneral approach to representing multifaceted personality constructs: Application to state self-esteem. Structural Equation Modeling, 1, 35-67.

- Bagozzi, R. P., & YI, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of Academy of Marketing Science, 16, 74 – 94.

- Bagozzi , R . P., &Yi, Y. (2012). Specifications, evaluation, and interpretation of structural equation models. Journal of Academy of Marketing Science, 40, 8-34.

- Barrett, P. (2007). Structural equation modeling: Adjudging model fit. Personality and Individual differences, 42, 815-824.

- Baumgartner, H., & Homburg, C. (1996). Applications of structural equation modeling in marketing and consumer Research: A review. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 13, 139-161.

- Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative Fit Indices in Structural Models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238-246.

- Bentler , P . M. (2002). EQS 6: Structural equations program manual. Encino,CA: Multivariate Software , Inc..

- Bentler, P . M., & Bonnett, D.G.( 1980 ) . Significance tests and goodness – of - fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 400-404.

- Bentler, P. M., & Chou, C. P. (1987). Practical issues in structural modeling. Sociological Methods and Research, 16, 78-117.

- Betz, N. E. (2005). Enhancing research productivity in counseling psychology: Reactions to three perspectives. The Counseling Psychologist, 33, 358 – 366.

- Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with Latent variables. New York: Wiley.

- Bollen , K . A., & Armiger, G. (1991). Observational residuals in factor analysis and structural equation models. In P.V. Marsden (Eds.),Sociological methodology (PP. 235-262). Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.

- Bollen, K. A., & Long, J. S. (1993). Introduction. In K.A. Bollen & J. S. long (eds.), Testing structural equation modeling (pp.1-9). Newburg park, CA: Sage.

- Boomsma, A. (1983). On the robustness of lisrel (maximum likelihood estimations) against small sample size and non-normality. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, university of Groningen, Groningen.

- Boomsma, A. (2000). Reporting analysis covariance structure. Structural Equation Modeling, 7, 461- 483.

- Boomsma, A., & Hoogland, J. J. (2001). The robustness of lisRel modeling revisited . In R. Cudeck , S . dutoit , & D. Sorbom (Eds.), Structural equation models: Present and future (PP. 139-188). Chicago: Scientific Software International.

- Bozdogan, H. (1987). Model selection and Akaike's information criterion (AIC): The general theory and its analytical extensions. Psychometrika, 52, 345-370.

- Brannick, M. T. (1995). Critical comments on applying covariance structure modeling. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 16, 201-213.

- Breckler, S. T. (1990). Application of covariance structure modeling in psychology: Cause for concern? Psychological Bulletin, 107, 260 – 273.

- Breivik, E., & Olsson, U. H. (2001). Adding variables to improve fit: The effect of model size on fit assessment in LISREL. In R. Cudeck, S .DU.Toit, &D. Sorbom (Eds.), Structural equation modeling: Present future(pp.169-194). Lincolnwood, IL: scientific software international.

- Brown, T. A. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York: Guilford Press.

- Browne, M. W. (1984). Asymptotic distribution free methods in the analysis of covariance structures. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 37, 62-83 .

- Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1989). Single sample cross-validation indices for covariance structures. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 24, 445-455.

- Browne, M. W., & Cudek, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K .A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (PP. 136-162) . Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

- Browne, R. L. (1994). Efficacy of the indirect approach for estimating structural equation models with missing data: A comparison of five methods. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 1, 287-316

- Burt, R. S. (1976). Interpretational confounding of unobserved variables in structural equation models. Sociological methods & Research, 5, 3-52.

- Chen, F., Bollen, K. A., Paxton, P., Curran, P. J., & Kirby, J. B. (2001). Improper solutions in structural equation models: Causes, consequences, and strategies. Sociological Methods & Research, 29, 468-508.

- Chou, C. P., & Bentler, P. M. (1995). Estimates and tests in structural equation modeling. In. R. H. Hoyle (Eds.), Structural equation modeling: concepts, issues, and applications (PP. 37- 59). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

- Chou, C ., Bentler , P . M., & Satorra, A . (1991). Scaled test statistics and robust standard errors for no normal data in covariance structure analysis: Monte Carol study. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 44 , 347 – 357 .

- Cliff, N. (1983). Some cautions concerning the application of causal modeling methods. Multivariate behavioral research, 18, 115-126.

- Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

- Costello, A. B., & Osborne, J. W. (2005). Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: Recommendations for getting the Most from your analysis. Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation, 10, 1-9.

- Crockett, S. A. (2012). A five – step guide to conducting SEM analysis in counseling research. Counseling Outcome Research and Evaluation, 3, 30-47.

- Cudeck, R. (1989). Analysis of correlation covariance structure models. Psychological Bulletin, 105, 317-327.

- Cuttance, P. (1987). Issues and problems in the application of Structural equation modeling. In p. Cuttance & R. Ecob ( Eds. ), structural modeling by example (PP . 241 – 279). New York: Cambridge University Press.

- Dancy, C. P., & Reidy, J. (2011). Statistics without maths for psychology(5th.ed). Harlow: Pearson, Prentice Hall.

- Du, Y. (2009). A review structural equation modeling and its use in library & information studies. Library & Information Science Research, 31, 257 – 263.

- Duncan, O. D. A. (1966). Path analysis: Sociological examples. American Journal of Sociology, 72, 1-16.

- Engle, K .S., Mossbrugger, H., & Muller, R. O. (2003). Evaluating the fit of structural equation models test of significance and descriptive goodness of – fit measures. Methods of Psychological Research Online, 8, 23 – 74.

- Fan, X., & Sivo, S. A. (2005). Sensitivity of fit indexes to mis-specified structural or measurement model components: rationale of two index strategy revisited. Structural Equation Modeling, 12, 343- 367.

- Fassinger, R. E. (1987). Use of structural equation modeling in counseling psychology research. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 34, 425 -436.

- Fava, J. L., & Velicer, W. F. (1992). The effects of over extraction on factor and component analysis. Multivariate Behavioral Research , 27,387-415.

- Field, A. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS(3th.ed). London: Sage publications, LTD.

- Fornell, C. (1983). Issues in the application of covariance structure analysis. Journal of Consumer Research, 9, 443-448.

- Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluation structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement errors. Journal of Marketing Research,18, 39-50.

- Fornell. C., & YI, Y. (1992). Assumptions of the two – step approach to latent variable modeling. Sociological Methods & Research, 20, 291-320.

- Freedman, D. A. (1987). As others see us: Acase study in path analysis(with discussion). Journal of Educational Statistics, 12, 101-223.

- Gebring, D. W, & Anderson, J. C. (1984). On the meaning of within factor correlated measurement errors. Journal of Consumer Research, 11, 572- 580.

- Goffin, R. D. (2007). Assessing the adequacy of structural equation models: Golden rules and editorial policies. Personality and Individual Differences, 42, 831-839.

- Green, S. B., & Salkind, N. J. (2014). Using SPSS for windows and macintosh: Analysing and understanding data (7th.ed). Boston: Pearson Education, Inc.

- Grewal, R., Cote, J. A., & Baumgartner, H. (2004). Multi-Collinearity and measurement error in structural equation models: Implications for theory testing. Marketing Science , 23, 519-529.

- Guadagnoli, E., & Velicer, W. F. (1988). Relation of sample size to the stability of component patterns. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 265-275.

- Hair Jr. J. H., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1998). Multivariate data analysis. New Jersey: Prentice- Hall.

- Hair, J. F., Ringlet, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. ( 2011 ). PLS – SEM: Indeed a silver bullet . Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice ,19, 139 – 151 .

- Harris, R. J. (1975). A primer of multivariate statistics. New York: Academic.

- Hayduk, L. A. (1996). LISREL: Issues, debates and strategies. Jones Hopkins University Press.

- Herting, J. R, & Costner, H. L. ( 1985 ). Respecification in multiple indicator models. In H. M. Blalock (Eds.), Causal models in the social sciences ( 2 nd .ed ) ( PP: 321 – 393 ) . New York: Aldin.

- Hinkle, D. E., &Wiersma, W., & Jurs, S .G. (1994). Applied statistics for the behavioral sciences(3rd.ed). Boston: Houghton.

- Holbert, R. L., & Stephenson, M. T. (2002). Structural equation modeling in communication sciences(1995- 2000). Human Communication Research, 28, 531-551.

- Hoogland, J. J., & Boomsma, A. (1998). Robustness studies in covariance structure modeling: An overview and a meta-analysis. Sociological Methods & Research, 26, 329-367.

- Hox, J. (1995). AMOS, EQS, and LISREL for windows: comparative review. Structural Equation Modeling, 2, 79-91.

- Hoyle, R. H. (1995). Structural equation modeling: Basic concepts and fundamental issues .In R . H. Hoyle (Eds.),Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications ( PP1-15 ). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

- Hoyle, R. H., & Smith, G. T. (1994). Formulating clinical research hypotheses as structural equation models: A conceptual overview. Journal of Counseling and Clinical Psychology, 62, 429 – 440.

- Hoyle, R. H, & Panter, A. T. (1995). Writing about structural equation modeling. In R. H. Hoyle (Eds.), Structural Equation Modeling: concepts, issues, and application (PP.158-175) .thousand Oaks: Sage.

- Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1995). Evaluating model fit. In R. H. Hoyle (Eds.), Structural equation modeling: concepts, issues, and applications (PP. 76- 99). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

- Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1998). Fit indices in covariance structure analysis: Sensitivity under parameterized model misspecification. Psychological Methods , 3, 424- 453.

- Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis. Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1- 55.

- Hu, L. T., Bentler, P. M., & Kano, Y. (1992). Can test statistics in covariance structure analysis be trusted? Psychological Bulletin, 112, 351-360.

- Hulland, J., Chow, Y. H., & Lan, S. (1996). Use of causal models in marketing research: A review. International. Journal. of Research in marketing, 13, 181-197.

- Iacobucci, D. (2010). Structural equation modeling: Fit indices, sample size, and advanced topics. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 20, 90-98.

- Jackson, D. L. (2001). Sample size and number of parameter estimates in maximum likelihood confirmatory factor analysis: A Monte Carlo investigation. Structural Equation Modeling, 8, 205-223.

- Jackson, D. L. (2003). Revisiting sample size and number of parameter estimates: Some support for the N: q hypothesis. Structural Equation Modeling, 10, 128-141.

- Joreskog, K . G. ( 1969 ). A general approach to confirmatory maximum likelihood , factor analysis . Psychometricak, 34, 183-202.

- Jöreskog, K. G. (1973), “A General Method for Estimating a Linear Structural Equation System,” in A. S. Goldberger and O. D. Duncan, eds., Structural Equation Models in the Social Sciences, New York: Academic Press.

- Joreskog, K. G. (1993). Testing structural equation modeling. In: K. A. Bollen & J. S. long (Eds.), Testing structural equation modeling. (PP. 294-326). Newbury Park, CA:Sage.

- Joreskog, K. G., & Sorbom, D. (1988). LISREL 7: A guide to the program and applications (2 nd. ed). Chicago: Illinois.

- Joreskog, K. G., & Sorbom, D. (1993). LISREL 8: user’s reference guide. Mooresville, In: scientific software.

- Joreskog, k. G., & Sorbom, D. (1996). LISREL 8: user's reference guide. Chicago, IL: Scientific software International.

- Joreskog, K. G., & Sorbom, D. (2006). LISREL for Windows 8.8. Lincolnwood, Illinois: Scientific Software International.

- Keesling, J. W. (1972). Maximuum likelihood approaches to casual flow analysis.Unpublished PhD dissertation,Department of Education, University of Chicago, Chicago

- Kaplan, D. (1990). Evaluating and modifying covariance structural models: A Review and recommendations .Multivariate Behavioral Research, 25, 137-155.

- Kaplan, D. (2000). Structural equation modeling: Foundations and extensions. Thousand oaks, CA: Sage.

- Kenny, D. A. (1987). Statistical for social and behavioral sciences .Canada: little, Brown Company limited.

- Kline, R. K. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3th.ed). New York: Guilford publications, Inc.

- Kline, R. K. (2016). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (4th.ed). New York: Guilford publications, Inc.

- Loehlin, J.C. (2004). Latent variable models: An introduction to factor, path, structural equation analysis(4th ed). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

- MacCallum, R. C. (1986). Specification searches in covariance structure modeling. Psychological Bulletin, 100, 107-120.

- MacCullum, R. C. (1998). Commentary on quantitative methods in IQ research. Industrial Organizational psychology, 35, 1- 4.

- MacCallum, R. C., Roznowski, M., & Necowit, L. B. (1992). Model modifications in covariance structure analysis: The problem of capitalization on chance. Psychological Bulletin, 111, 490 – 504 .

- MacCallum, R. C, & Wagener, D. T., Uchino, B. N., & Fabrigar, L. R. (1993). The Problem of equivalent models in application of covariance Structure analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 144, 185- 199.

- MacCallum, R. C., Browne, M. W., & Sugawara, H. M. (1996). Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychological methods, 1, 130-149.

- MacCallum, R. C, & Austin, J. T. (2000). Application of structural equation modeling in psychological research. Annual Review of Psychology, 51, 201-226.

- Mallow, C. L. (1973). Some comments on Cp. Technometrics, 15, 661-675.

- Mardia, K. V. (1970). Measures of multivariate skewness and kurtosis with applications. Biometrika , 57, 519 – 530 .

- Marsh, H. W., Balla, J. R., & McDonald, R. P. (1988). Goodness of fit indexes in confirmatory analysis: The effect of sample size. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 391-411.

- Marsh, H. W., & Hau, K. T. (1996). Assessing goodness of fit: is parsimony always desirable? Journal of Experimental Education, 96,364-391.

- Marsh, H. W., & Hau, K. T. (2007). Application of latent – variable models in educational al psychology: the need for methodological substantive synergies. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 32, 151 – 170.

- Marsh, H. W., Hau, K. T., Balla, J. R., & Grayson, D. (1998). is more ever too much?: The number of indicator per factoring confirmatory Factor analysis. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 33, 181 – 220.

- Marsh, H . W., Hau, T., & Grayson . D. (2005). Goodness of fit evaluation in structural equation modeling . In A. Mayday – Olivares & J . McCardle (eds.), Psychometrics: A festschrift to Roderick P. McDonald (PP. 275-340 ). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, INC.

- March, H. W., Hau, K. T., & Wen, Z. (2004). In search of golden rules: Comment on hypothesis testing approaches to setting cut off values for fit indexes and dangers on overgeneralizing Hu and Bentler s(1999) findings. Structural Equation Modeling, 11, 320-341.

- Martines, M. P. (2005). The use of structural equation modeling in counseling psychology research. The Counseling Psychologist, 33, 269- 298.

- Maruyama, G. M. (1998). Basics of structural equation modeling. Thousand Oaks: Sage publications, Inc.

- McDonald, R. P., & Ho, M. R. (2000). Principles and practice of reporting structural equation modeling. Psychological Methods, 7, 64- 82.

- McDonald, R. P., & Marsh, H. W. (1990). Choosing a multivariate model: Noncentrality and goodness of fit. Psychological bulletin, 107, 247.

- Micceri, I . (1989). The unicon , the normal curve and other improbable creatures . Psychological Bulletin, 105, 156 – 165.

- Mulaik, S. A. (2009). Linear causal modeling with structural equations. BocaRaton: Chapman &Hall-CRC.

- Mulaik, S. A., Jams, L. R., Alstine, J. V ., Bonnett, N., lind, S., & Stilwell, D. C. (1989) . Evaluation of goodness of fit indices for structural equation models. Psychological Bulletin, 105, 430-445.

- Mulaik, S. A., & Millsap, R. E. (2000). Doing the four step right. Structural Equation Modeling, 7, 36- 73.

- Muller, R. O. (1996). Basic Principles of structural equation modeling. New York: Springer- verlag.

- Muthen. B. (1984). A general structural equation model with dichotomous, ordered categorical and continuous latent variable indicators. Psychometrika , 49, 15-132 .

- Muthen, B. O., Du-Toit, S. H., &Spisic, D. (1997). Robust inference using weighted least square and quartic estimation equations in latent variable modeling with categorical and continuous outcomes. From:www.gseis.ucla.edu/faculty/ Muthen/articles.

- Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2002). How to use a Monte Carlo study to decide on sample size and determine power. Structural Equation Modeling, 4, 599-620.

- Muthén, L., & Muthen, B.O. (1998-2010). Mplus User’s Guide, (6th Ed.).Muthén and Muthén, Los Angeles. CA, USA.

- Neale, M. C. (1997). MX: Statistical Modeling. Richmond, VA: Dept. Psychiatry, Med. Coll . Virginia.

- Nevitt, J., & Hancock, G. R. (2001). Performance of bootstrapping approaches to model test statistics and parameter standard error estimation in structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling, 8, 353-377.

- Nunkoo, R., Ramkissom, H., & Gursoy, D. (2013). Use of structural equation modeling in tourism research: Past, present, and future. Journal of Travel Research, xxx, 1-13.

- Nunnaly, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.

- Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd.ed). New York: McGraw –Hill.

- Pearl, J. (2000). Causality: models, reasoning, and inferences. New York: Cambridge University-Press

- Quintana, S. M., & Maxwell, S. E. (1999). Implications of recent development in structural equation modeling for counseling psychology. The Counseling Psychologist, 27, 485- 537.

- Raykov, T., & Marcoulides, G. A. (2006). A first course in structural equation modeling (2nd. ed). New Jersey: Erlbaum.

- Raykov, T., Tomer, A., & Nesselroade. J. R. (1991). Reporting structural equation modeling results in psychology and aging: some proposed guidelines. Psychology and Aging, 6, 499 – 503.

- Ridgon, E. E. (1995). A necessary and sufficient identification rule for structural models estimated in practice. Multivariate Behavior Research, 30, 359-383.

- Satorra, A., & Bentler, P. M. (1994). Corrections to test statistics and standard errors in covariance structure analysis. In A. Von Eye & C. C. Clogg (Eds.), Latent variable analysis: Applications for development research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

- Schreiber, J. B., Stage, F. K., king, k., Nora, A., & Barlow, E.A. (2006). Reporting structural equation modeling and confirmatory factor analysis results: A Review. The Journal of Education Research, 99, 323-337.

- Schumacker, R. E., & Lomax, R. G. (1996). Beginner’s guide to structural equation modeling. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

- Schumacker, R. E., & Lomax, R. G. (2010). Beginner’s guide to structural equation modeling (3rd ed). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

- Shah, R., & Goldstein, S. M. (2006). Use of structural equation modeling in operations management research: Looking back and forward. Journal of Operation Management, 24, 148-169.

- Sharama, S., Mukherjee, S., Kumar, A., & Dillon, W. R. (2005). A simulation study to investigate the use of cut off values for assessing model fit in covariance structural models. Journal of Business Research,58,935- 943.

- Shook, C. L., Ketchen D. J., Hult, G. T. M., & Kacmar, K. M. (2004). An assessment of the use of structural equation modeling in strategic management Research. Strategic Management Journal, 25, 397 -404.

- Smith, d., & Smith, K. L. (2004). Structural equation modeling in management accounting research: Critical analysis and opportunities. Journal Accounting Literature, 23, 49 – 86.

- StatSoft, Inc. (2009). STATISTICA 9(Computer software). Tulsa, OK:Author.

- Steiger, J. H. (1990a). Structural model evaluation and Modification: An interval estimation approach. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 25, 173-180.

- Steiger, J. H. (1990b). Some additional thoughts on component , and factor indeterminacy. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 25,41-45.

- Steiger, J. H. (1999). Structural equation modeling (SEPATH). Statistics for windows, vol.111. Stat Soft, Tulsa,Ok.

- Steiger, J . H., & lind, J. M. (1980). Statistical based tests for the number of common factors. Paper presented the Meeting of Psychometric society, Iowa City, IA.

- Stelzl, I. (1986). Changing a causal hypothesis without changing the fit; some rules for generating equivalent path models. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 21,309-331.

- Steven, J. P. (2009). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences. New York: Rout ledge.

- SystatSoftware, Inc. (2009). SYSTAT(Version 13.0)(Computer software). Chicago:Author.

- Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. ( 2007 ). Using multivariate statistics (4 th.ed). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

- Tanaka, J. S. (1987). “How big is big enough?”: Sample size and goodness of fit in structural equation modeling. Child Development, 58, 134-146.

- Thompson, B. (2000). Ten commandments of structural equation modeling. In L. G. Grimm & P. R. Yarnold(Eds.), Reading and understanding more multivariate statistics(pp. 261-283). Washington, DC: Amrican Psychological Association.

- Ullman, J. B. (2006). Structural equation modeling: Reviewing the basics and Moving forward. Journal of Personality Assessment, 87, 35- 50.

- Ullman,J. B., & Bentler, P. M. (2013). Structural equation modeling .In. I. B. Weiner (Eds.), Handbook of Psychology (2nd .ed.), (pp. 661 – 690 ) . John wiely & Sons, Inc.

- West, S. G., Finch, J. F., & Curran, P. J. (1995). Structural equation modeling with non normal variables: problems and remedies. In R. H. Hoyle (Eds.), Structural equation modeling: concepts, issues, and applications (PP. 65- 75). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

- Weston, R., & Gore, P. A. (2006). A brief guide to structural equation modeling. The Counseling Psychologist, 34 – 719 -751.

- Wilcox, R. R. (2009). Basic statistics: Undrestanding conventional methods and modern insights. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

- Wiley, D. E. (1973). The identification problem for structural equation models with unmeasured variables. In A. Goldberg & O.D. Duncan(Eds.), Structural equation models in the social sciences(pp. 69-84). New York: Academic Press.

- Wright, S. (1920). The relative importance of heredity and environment in determinining the piebald pattern of guinea pigs. Proceedings of the National Academy of sciencse, 6, 320-332.

- WU. C. J. ( 2009 ). Factor analysis of the general self – efficacy scale and its relationship with Individualism / collectivism among twenty – five countries: Application of multilevel confirmatory factor analysis. Personality and Individual Differences , 46, 699 – 703.

Yu, C. Y. (2002). Evaluation cutoff criteria of model fit indices for latent variable models with categorical and continuous outcomes. Unpublished manuscript, University of California, Los Angelles, CA.